Bizarre
story from Texas.
Anti-Muslim group holds Prophet Muhammad cartoon event. Two
men show up to attack the event, Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi, and they
are shot dead.
Now, ISIS is claiming responsibility for the attack at a
center near Dallas that was exhibiting cartoon depictions of the
Prophet Muhammad.
But, are they? Was there any command and control? What there
any actual attempt to bring Elton and Nadir into the fold? I doubt it.
It’s publicity. Anyone purporting to be Muslim and act
against the infidel will be claimed as “a soldier of the caliphate.” The truth
is that they are likely disturbed young men who are inspired by the existence
of ISIS, Al Qaeda, Boko Haram, and the like. So, in a sense, ISIS is responsible
but not in the way that we would ordinarily use that word.
We do not, for instance, hold parents to be responsible for everything
they their children do. Nor is Canada responsible for all of the actions of all
of its people. We generally think of responsibility as being a direct result of
decisions that have power.
No comments:
Post a Comment