Niqab’s are
offensive to a majority of Canadians – 82% of Canadians support the rule that
Niqabs should not be worn as one takes the Canadian citizenship oath. But,
being offended is not reason enough to ban it. The Charter of Rights and
Freedoms guarantees that we are free to go around offending one another –
within reasonable limits. Clothing seems well within reason.
Two
arguments are presented for banning the Niqab. First, it is a security risk. Canadians
have a right to know who is becoming a Canadian. Of course we do. And, the
Federal Court of Canada recognizes this. You are required to show your face and
identify yourself. As an accommodation to your religious belief, this can be
done in private and then you may wear your Niqab in the public ceremony. There
is no security risk that is inherent to wearing a Niqab. Where there are security
risks, there are workarounds.
Second, the
Niqab oppresses women. Last night in the French language leaders’ debate Harper
argued for the Niqab ban: "Mr. Mulcair, I will never tell my young
daughter that a woman should cover her face because she's a woman.” For this I
am glad. Neither would I. And, neither would something like 99 percent of
Canadians. The problem is that you do not know this to be the reason why any
particular women is choosing to wear a Niqab. Why this woman is wearing Niqab. You
cannot place your value judgement onto a specific individual. It may be that she is oppressed but it may be that she is not. Viewed worldwide,
the Niqab is oppressive. But viewed one individual at a time it might be a
bona fide, freely held religious belief.
It may offend if someone wore clown makeup to a citizenship
ceremony. Or, too short a skirt. Being offended, though, is not reason enough
to ban the practice. And note that this is a tempest in a teapot. There are
very few new Canadians wanting to wear a Niqab for their citizenship oath.
Very, very few. Let’s concentrate on building a society of equality and freedom
so that these woman can choose not to wear a Niqab. But, forcing them to
uncover when it may well be against a freely held religious belief is not
progress.
No comments:
Post a Comment